1: Allgemeine Informationstexte
Was muss ich zur Kniearthrose wissen?
-
- Harrasser, N., Eisenhart-Rothe, R. & Biberthaler, P. (Hrsg.). (2016). Facharztwissen Orthopädie
Unfallchirurgie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44463-4 - Harrasser, N., Huber-Wagner, S., Eisenhart-Rothe, R. von, Gollwitzer, H., Toepfer, A., Salzmann, M.,
Berger, N., Knebel, C., Margraf, J. & Banke, I. (2016). Untere Extremität. In N. Harrasser, R.
Eisenhart-Rothe & P. Biberthaler (Hrsg.), Facharztwissen Orthopädie Unfallchirurgie (S. 367–
619). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44463-4_8 - Pap, G. & Meinecke, I. (2011). Ätiologie und Pathogenese der Gonarthrose. In D. C. Wirtz (Hrsg.), AEManual der Endoprothetik (S. 33–46). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12889-9_3 - Previtali, D., Andriolo, L., Di Laura Frattura, G., Boffa, A., Candrian, C., Zaffagnini, S. & Filardo, G. (2020). Pain Trajectories in Knee Osteoarthritis-A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis on Pain Predictors. Journal of clinical medicine, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092828
- Wirtz, D. C. (Hrsg.). (2011). AE-Manual der Endoprothetik. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12889-9
- Harrasser, N., Eisenhart-Rothe, R. & Biberthaler, P. (Hrsg.). (2016). Facharztwissen Orthopädie
Gibt es neben einem künstlichen Kniegelenk andere Möglichkeiten die Kniearthrose zu behandeln?
-
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF): S2k-Leitlinie Gonarthrose. Registernummer 033–004, Stand 18.01.2018, unter: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/033-004l_S2k_Gonarthrose_2018-01_1-verlaengert_01.pdf (abgerufen am 07.07.2022)
- Lützner, J., Lange, T., Schmitt, J. et al. S2k-Leitlinie: Indikation Knieendoprothese. Orthopäde 47, 777–781 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00132-018-3612-x
Teil-Endoprothese
-
- Flören, M. & Reichel, H. (2011). Implantate. In D. C. Wirtz (Hrsg.), AE-Manual der Endoprothetik (Bd.
89, S. 57–71). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12889-9_5 - Jerosch, J. (2015). Welche Prothesen für das Kniegelenk gibt es? In J. Jerosch, J. Heisel & C. O. Tibesku
(Hrsg.), Knieendoprothetik (83-B, S. 61–103). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38423-3_4
- Flören, M. & Reichel, H. (2011). Implantate. In D. C. Wirtz (Hrsg.), AE-Manual der Endoprothetik (Bd.
Total-Endoprothese
-
- Flören, M. & Reichel, H. (2011). Implantate. In D. C. Wirtz (Hrsg.), AE-Manual der Endoprothetik (Bd.
89, S. 57–71). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12889-9_5
- Flören, M. & Reichel, H. (2011). Implantate. In D. C. Wirtz (Hrsg.), AE-Manual der Endoprothetik (Bd.
Total-Endoprothese mit verschiedenen Kopplungsgraden
-
- Tibesku, C. O. (2015). Grundzüge der Operationstechnik. In J. Jerosch, J. Heisel & C. O. Tibesku
(Hrsg.), Knieendoprothetik (Bd. 436, S. 135–221). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38423-3_7
- Tibesku, C. O. (2015). Grundzüge der Operationstechnik. In J. Jerosch, J. Heisel & C. O. Tibesku
Total-Endoprothese mit oder ohne Ersatz der Kniescheibenrückseit
-
- Tibesku, C. O. (2015). Grundzüge der Operationstechnik. In J. Jerosch, J. Heisel & C. O. Tibesku
(Hrsg.), Knieendoprothetik (Bd. 436, S. 135–221). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38423-3_7
- Tibesku, C. O. (2015). Grundzüge der Operationstechnik. In J. Jerosch, J. Heisel & C. O. Tibesku
Total-Endoprothese mit oder ohne zementierte Befestigung
-
- Jerosch, J. (2015). Welche Prothesen für das Kniegelenk gibt es? In J. Jerosch, J. Heisel & C. O. Tibesku
(Hrsg.), Knieendoprothetik (83-B, S. 61–103). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38423-3_4
- Jerosch, J. (2015). Welche Prothesen für das Kniegelenk gibt es? In J. Jerosch, J. Heisel & C. O. Tibesku
Total-Endoprothese mit oder ohne computergestützter Navigation
-
- Röhrig, H. (2011). Operation der Kniegelenksendoprothese. In D. C. Wirtz (Hrsg.), AE-Manual der
Endoprothetik (Bd. 20, S. 127–141). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12889-9_9
- Röhrig, H. (2011). Operation der Kniegelenksendoprothese. In D. C. Wirtz (Hrsg.), AE-Manual der
Total-Endoprothese mit oder ohne patientenindividuelle Instrumente
-
- Tibesku, C. O. (2015). Grundzüge der Operationstechnik. In J. Jerosch, J. Heisel & C. O. Tibesku
(Hrsg.), Knieendoprothetik (Bd. 436, S. 135–221). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38423-3_7
- Tibesku, C. O. (2015). Grundzüge der Operationstechnik. In J. Jerosch, J. Heisel & C. O. Tibesku
Total-Endoprothese mit oder ohne robotergestützte Navigation
-
- van der List, J. P., Chawla, H. & Pearle, A. D. (2016). Robotic-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty: An Overview.
American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, N.J.), 45(4), 202–211
- van der List, J. P., Chawla, H. & Pearle, A. D. (2016). Robotic-Assisted Knee Arthroplasty: An Overview.
Welche zusätzlichen Maßnahmen sind während der Operation möglich?
-
- Jerosch, J. (2015). Postoperative Probleme. In: Knieendoprothetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38423-3_10
- Seuser, A. (2011). Postoperative Maßnahmen. In: Wirtz, D. (Hrsg.) AE-Manual der Endoprothetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12889-9_12
- Wirtz, D. C. (Hrsg.) (2011). AE-Manual der Endoprothetik. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12889-9 - Wirz, S. (2011). Anästhesie. In: Wirtz, D. (Hrsg.) AE-Manual der Endoprothetik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12889-9_8
Was gibt es vor dem Eingriff zu beachten?
-
- Gelse, K., Katzer, A. & Pförringer, W. (2020). Kniegelenksendoprothese (Ersatzt des Kniegelenks):
Dokumentierte Patientenaufklärung. Thieme Compliance GmbH. - National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2020). Joint replacement (primary): hip, knee and
shoulder. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng157 - Thomsen, T., Villebro, N. & Møller, A. M. (2014). Interventions for preoperative smoking cessation.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (3), CD002294.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002294.pub4
- Gelse, K., Katzer, A. & Pförringer, W. (2020). Kniegelenksendoprothese (Ersatzt des Kniegelenks):
Was gibt es nach dem Eingriff zu beachten?
-
- Jerosch, J. (2015). Postoperative Komplikationen. In J. Jerosch, J. Heisel & C. O. Tibesku (Hrsg.),
Knieendoprothetik (S. 285–371). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38423-3_11 - Jerosch, J., Heisel, J. & Tibesku, C. O. (Hrsg.). (2015). Knieendoprothetik. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38423-3 - National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2020). Joint replacement (primary): hip, knee and
shoulder. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng157
- Jerosch, J. (2015). Postoperative Komplikationen. In J. Jerosch, J. Heisel & C. O. Tibesku (Hrsg.),
Was kann ich für die Entlassung Vorbereiten?
-
- Dölken, M. (2015). Physiotherapie in der Orthopädie (3. Aufl.). Physiolehrbuch. Thieme
- Hoogeboom, T. J., Dronkers, J. J., Hulzebos, E. H. J. & van Meeteren, N. L. U. (2014). Merits of exercise
therapy before and after major surgery. Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 27(2), 161–166.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000062 - National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2020). Joint replacement (primary): hip, knee and
shoulder. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng157
Hinweise für die Zeit nach der Operation
-
- § 315c Gefährdung des Straßenverkehrs Absatz 1 Satz 1b StGB. https://www.gesetze-iminternet.de/stgb/__315c.html
- Giannoudis, V., Guy, S., Romano, R., Carsten, O., Pandit, H. & van Duren, B. (2021). Doctor when can I
drive? Braking response after knee arthroplasty: A systematic review & meta-analysis of
brake reaction time. The Knee, 30, 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2021.03.013 - Hoogeboom, T. J., Dronkers, J. J., Hulzebos, E. H. J. & van Meeteren, N. L. U. (2014). Merits of exercise
therapy before and after major surgery. Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 27(2), 161–166.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ - Konings, M. J., Vroey, H. de, Weygers, I. & Claeys, K. (2020). Effect of knee arthroplasty on sports
participation and activity levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ open sport &
exercise medicine, 6(1), e000729. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000729 - National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2020). Joint replacement (primary): hip, knee and
shoulder. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng157 - Thomsen, T., Villebro, N. & Møller, A. M. (2014). Interventions for preoperative smoking cessation.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (3), CD002294.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002294.pub4 - van Leemput, D., Neirynck, J., Berger, P. & Vandenneucker, H. (2021). Return to Work after Primary
Total Knee Arthroplasty under the Age of 65 Years: A Systematic Review. The journal of knee
surgery. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1722626
Wichtige Fragen
-
- Gelse, K., Katzer, A. & Pförringer, W. (2020). Kniegelenksendoprothese (Ersatzt des Kniegelenks):
Dokumentierte Patientenaufklärung. Thieme Compliance GmbH.
- Gelse, K., Katzer, A. & Pförringer, W. (2020). Kniegelenksendoprothese (Ersatzt des Kniegelenks):
2: Konservative Behandlung
Nutzen
-
- Skou, S. T., Roos, E. M., Laursen, M. B., Rathleff, M. S., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Simonsen, O. &
Rasmussen, S. (2015). A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Total Knee Replacement. N Engl J
Med, 373(17), 1597–1606. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1505467
- Skou, S. T., Roos, E. M., Laursen, M. B., Rathleff, M. S., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Simonsen, O. &
3: Komplikationen unabhängig von Prothesentypen, Verankerungsmethoden oder
Operationsverfahren
Bluttransfusionen
-
- Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2019). The clinical and
cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial
compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The
Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2020). Total versus
partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the
TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24200 - Cankaya, D., Ozkurt, B., Aydin, C. & Tabak, A. Y. (2014). No difference in blood loss between
posterior-cruciate-ligament-retaining and posterior-cruciate-ligament-stabilized total knee
arthroplasties. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA,
22(8), 1865–1869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2818-z - Gøthesen, O., Espehaug, B., Havelin, L. I., Petursson, G., Hallan, G., Strøm, E., Dyrhovden, G. &
Furnes, O. (2014). Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and
conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised
controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 96-b(5), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b5.32516 - Ikawa, T., Takemura, S., Kim, M., Takaoka, K., Minoda, Y. & Kadoya, Y. (2017). Usefulness of an
accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J, 99-
b(8), 1047–1052. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.99b8.Bjj-2016-0596.R3 - Kizaki, K., Shanmugaraj, A., Yamashita, F., Simunovic, N., Duong, A., Khanna, V. & Ayeni, O. R. (2019).
Total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instrumentation for osteoarthritis of the knee:
a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 20(1), 561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6 - Petursson, G., Fenstad, A. M., Gøthesen, Ø., Dyrhovden, G. S., Hallan, G., Röhrl, S. M., Aamodt, A. &
Furnes, O. (2018). Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Replacement:
A Multicenter Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of bone and joint
surgery. American volume, 100(15), 1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01338 - Sun, P. F. & Jia, Y. H. (2012). Mobile bearing UKA compared to fixed bearing TKA: a randomized
prospective study. The Knee, 19(2), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2011.01.006 - Varela-Egocheaga, J. R., Suárez-Suárez, M. A., Fernández-Villán, M., González-Sastre, V., VarelaGómez, J. R. & Rodríguez-Merchán, C. (2010). Minimally invasive subvastus approach:
improving the results of total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. Clin Orthop
Relat Res, 468(5), 1200–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1160-8
- Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Verrutschen der Kniescheibe
-
- Boonen, B., Schotanus, M. G., Kerens, B., van der Weegen, W., Hoekstra, H. J. & Kort, N. P. (2016). No
difference in clinical outcome between patient-matched positioning guides and conventional
instrumented total knee arthroplasty two years post-operatively: a multicentre, doubleblind, randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 98-b(7), 939–944.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b7.37274 - Breugem, S. J., Sierevelt, I. N., Schafroth, M. U., Blankevoort, L., Schaap, G. R. & van Dijk, C. N. (2008).
Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing
prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(8), 1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6 - Breugem, S. J., van Ooij, B., Haverkamp, D., Sierevelt, I. N. & van Dijk, C. N. (2014). No difference in
anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty
after 7.9 years. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA,
22(3), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2281-2 - Catani, F., Leardini, A., Ensini, A., Cucca, G., Bragonzoni, L., Toksvig-Larsen, S. & Giannini, S. (2004).
The stability of the cemented tibial component of total knee arthroplasty: posterior cruciateretaining versus posterior-stabilized design. The Journal of arthroplasty, 19(6), 775–782.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.01.013 - Chalidis, B. E., Petsatodis, G., Christodoulou, A. G., Christoforidis, J., Papadopoulos, P. P. & Pournaras,
J. (2010). Is obesity a contraindication for minimal invasive total knee replacement? A
prospective randomized control trial. Obes Surg, 20(12), 1633–1641.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9968-6 - Grodzki, T., Haak, H., Behrendt, R., Merk, H. & Krauspe, R. (2001) [Prospective randomized
comparative study of early functional outcome of 2 knee joint endoprosthesis systems–
rotation plateau versus fixed polyethylene inlay]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 139(5), 393–396.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-17980 - Harrington, M. A., Hopkinson, W. J., Hsu, P. & Manion, L. (2009). Fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee
arthroplasty: does it make a difference?–a prospective randomized study. The Journal of
arthroplasty, 24(6 Suppl), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.031 - Kawakami, Y., Matsumoto, T., Takayama, K., Ishida, K., Nakano, N., Matsushita, T., Kuroda, Y., Patel,
K., Kuroda, R. & Kurosaka, M. (2015). Intermediate-Term Comparison of Posterior Cruciate-
Retaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the New Knee Scoring
System. Orthopedics, 38(12), e1127-32. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20151123-03 - Killen, C. J., Murphy, M. P., Hopkinson, W. J., Harrington, M. A., Adams, W. H. & Rees, H. W. (2020).
Minimum twelve-year follow-up of fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Double
blinded randomized trial. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 11(1), 154–159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.019 - Park, C. H., Kang, S. G., Bae, D. K. & Song, S. J. (2019). Mid-term clinical and radiological results do not
differ between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty using titanium-nitridecoated posterior-stabilized prostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Knee
surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 27(4), 1165–1173.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5095 - Park, S. E. & Lee, C. T. (2007). Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation
of a primary total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 22(7), 1054–1059.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.036 - Turgeon, T. R., Cameron, B., Burnell, C. D., Hedden, D. R. & Bohm, E. R. (2019). A double-blind
randomized controlled trial of total knee replacement using patient-specific cutting block
instrumentation versus standard instrumentation. Can J Surg, 62(6), 460–467.
https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018318 - Woolson, S. T., Harris, A. H., Wagner, D. W. & Giori, N. J. (2014). Component alignment during total
knee arthroplasty with use of standard or custom instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial
using computed tomography for postoperative alignment measurement. The Journal of bone
and joint surgery. American volume, 96(5), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.L.01722
- Boonen, B., Schotanus, M. G., Kerens, B., van der Weegen, W., Hoekstra, H. J. & Kort, N. P. (2016). No
eingeschränkter Bewegungsumfang (Steifigkeit)
-
- Abdel, M. P., Tibbo, M. E., Stuart, M. J., Trousdale, R. T., Hanssen, A. D. & Pagnano, M. W. (2018). A
randomized controlled trial of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a followup at a mean of ten years. Bone Joint J, 100-b(7), 925–929. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b7.Bjj-2017-1473.R1 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2019). The clinical and
cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial
compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The
Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2020). Total versus
partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the
TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/h - Blakeney, W. G., Khan, R. J. & Wall, S. J. (2011). Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional
guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 93(15), 1377–1384.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.I.01321 - Boonen, B., Schotanus, M. G., Kerens, B., van der Weegen, W., Hoekstra, H. J. & Kort, N. P. (2016). No
difference in clinical outcome between patient-matched positioning guides and conventional
instrumented total knee arthroplasty two years post-operatively: a multicentre, doubleblind, randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 98-b(7), 939–944.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b7.37274 - Breeman, S., Campbell, M., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
MacLennan, G., Morris, R. & Murray, D. (2011). Patellar resurfacing in total knee
replacement: five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 93(16), 1473–1481.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.J.00725 - Breeman, S., Campbell, M. K., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
MacLennan, G. S., Morris, R. W. & Murray, D. W. (2013). Five-year results of a randomised
controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J,
95-B(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B4.29454 - Breugem, S. J., Sierevelt, I. N., Schafroth, M. U., Blankevoort, L., Schaap, G. R. & van Dijk, C. N. (2008).
Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing
prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(8), 1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6 - Breugem, S. J., van Ooij, B., Haverkamp, D., Sierevelt, I. N. & van Dijk, C. N. (2014). No difference in
anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty
after 7.9 years. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA,
22(3), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2281-2 - Campbell, D. G., Duncan, W. W., Ashworth, M., Mintz, A., Stirling, J., Wakefield, L. & Stevenson, T. M.
(2006). Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: a ten-year randomised prospective
trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88(6), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.88b6.16822 - Catani, F., Leardini, A., Ensini, A., Cucca, G., Bragonzoni, L., Toksvig-Larsen, S. & Giannini, S. (2004).
The stability of the cemented tibial component of total knee arthroplasty: posterior cruciateretaining versus posterior-stabilized design. The Journal of arthroplasty, 19(6), 775–782.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.01.013 - Chaudhary, R., Beaupré, L. A. & Johnston, D. W. C. (2008). Knee range of motion during the first two
years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee
prostheses. A randomized clinical trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American
volume, 90(12), 2579–2586. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.00995 - Chauhan, S. K., Scott, R. G., Breidahl, W. & Beaver, R. J. (2004). Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty
versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg
Br, 86(3), 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14643 - Choong, P. F., Dowsey, M. M. & Stoney, J. D. (2009). Does accurate anatomical alignment result in
better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee
arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 24(4), 560–569.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018 - Dossett, H. G., Estrada, N. A., Swartz, G. J., LeFevre, G. W. & Kwasman, B. G. (2014). A randomised
controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year
clinical results. Bone Joint J, 96-b(7), 907–913. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b7.32812 - Dowsey, M. M., Gould, D. J., Spelman, T., Pandy, M. G. & Choong, P. F. (2020). A Randomized
Controlled Trial Comparing a Medial Stabilized Total Knee Prosthesis to a Cruciate Retaining
and Posterior Stabilized Design: A Report of the Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following
Total Knee Replacement. The Journal of arthroplasty, 35(6), 1583-1590.e2.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.085 - Feller, J. A., Bartlett, R. J. & Lang, D. M. (1996). Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee
arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 78(2), 226–228 - Fricka, K. B., McAsey, C. J. & Sritulanondha, S. (2019). To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 34(7s), S183-s187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/ - Fricka, K. B., Sritulanondha, S. & McAsey, C. J. (2015). To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty (TKA). The Journal of arthroplasty, 30(9 Suppl), 55–58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.049 - Gioe, T. J., Glynn, J., Sembrano, J., Suthers, K., Santos, E. R. & Singh, J. (2009). Mobile and fixedbearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective
randomized trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(9), 2104–2112.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01442 - Gøthesen, O., Espehaug, B., Havelin, L. I., Petursson, G., Hallan, G., Strøm, E., Dyrhovden, G. &
Furnes, O. (2014). Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and
conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised
controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 96-b(5), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b5.32516 - Hanusch, B., Lou, T. N., Warriner, G., Hui, A. & Gregg, P. (2010). Functional outcome of PFC Sigma
fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled
trial. Int Orthop, 34(3), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/ - Harrington, M. A., Hopkinson, W. J., Hsu, P. & Manion, L. (2009). Fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee
arthroplasty: does it make a difference?–a prospective randomized study. The Journal of
arthroplasty, 24(6 Suppl), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.031 - Harvie, P., Sloan, K. & Beaver, R. J. (2012). Computer navigation vs conventional total knee
arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial. The Journal of
arthroplasty, 27(5), 667-72.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.009 - Huijbregts, H. J., Khan, R. J., Fick, D. P., Hall, M. J., Punwar, S. A., Sorensen, E., Reid, M. J., Vedove, S.
D. & Haebich, S. (2016). Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee
arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system
with patient-specific instrumentation. Bone Joint J, 98-b(8), 1043–1049.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b8.37240 - Jacobs, W. C., Christen, B., Wymenga, A. B., Schuster, A., van der Schaaf, D. B., Ham, A. ten & Wehrli,
U. (2012). Functional performance of mobile versus fixed bearing total knee prostheses: a
randomised controlled trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal
of the ESSKA, 20(8), 1450–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1684-9 - Johnston, L., MacLennan, G., McCormack, K., Ramsay, C. & Walker, A. (2009). The Knee Arthroplasty
Trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after
alternative approaches to knee replacement. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American
volume, 91(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.01074 - Kalisvaart, M. M., Pagnano, M. W., Trousdale, R. T., Stuart, M. J. & Hanssen, A. D. (2012). Randomized
clinical trial of rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no clinically
detectable differences at five years. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume,
94(6), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.K.00315 - Karachalios, T., Giotikas, D., Roidis, N., Poultsides, L., Bargiotas, K. & Malizos, K. N. (2008). Total knee
replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective
randomised clinical and radiological trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90(5), 584–591.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.90b5.20122 - Killen, C. J., Murphy, M. P., Hopkinson, W. J., Harrington, M. A., Adams, W. H. & Rees, H. W. (2020).
Minimum twelve-year follow-up of fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Double
blinded randomized trial. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 11(1), 154–159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.019 - Kosse, N. M., Heesterbeek, P. J. C., Schimmel, J. J. P., van Hellemondt, G. G., Wymenga, A. B. &
Defoort, K. C. (2018). Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific
instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee surgery,
sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 26(6), 1792–1799.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4792-3 - Kotela, A., Lorkowski, J., Kucharzewski, M., Wilk-Frańczuk, M., Śliwiński, Z., Frańczuk, B., Łęgosz, P. &
Kotela, I. (2015). Patient-Specific CT-Based Instrumentation versus Conventional
Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on
Clinical Outcomes and In-Hospital Data. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 165908.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/165908 - NCT02539992. (2012, May – 2015, May). ShapeMatch Cutting Guide Functional Outcomes Study
(ShapeMatch).
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02539992?term=NCT02539992&draw=2&rank=1 - Newman, J., Pydisetty, R. V. & Ackroyd, C. (2009). Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the
15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91(1), 52–
57. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.91b1.20899 - Newman, J. H., Ackroyd, C. E. & Shah, N. A. (1998). Unicompartmental or total knee replacement?
Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with
unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80(5), 862–865.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b5.8835 - Øhrn, F. D., van Leeuwen, J., Tsukanaka, M. & Röhrl, S. M. (2018). A 2-year RSA study of the Vanguard
CR total knee system: A randomized controlled trial comparing patient-specific positioning
guides with conventional technique. Acta Orthop, 89(4), 418–424.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1470866 - Pang, H. N., Yeo, S. J., Chong, H. C., Chin, P. L., Ong, J. & Lo, N. N. (2011). Computer-assisted gap
balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with
conventional measured resection technique. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
: official journal of the ESSKA, 19(9), 1496–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1483-3 - Park, C. H., Kang, S. G., Bae, D. K. & Song, S. J. (2019). Mid-term clinical and radiological results do not
differ between fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty using titanium-nitridecoated posterior-stabilized prostheses: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Knee
surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 27(4), 1165–1173.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5095-z - Petursson, G., Fenstad, A. M., Gøthesen, Ø., Dyrhovden, G. S., Hallan, G., Röhrl, S. M., Aamodt, A. &
Furnes, O. (2018). Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Replacement:
A Multicenter Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of bone and joint
surgery. American volume, 100(15), 1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01338 - Spencer, J. M., Chauhan, S. K., Sloan, K., Taylor, A. & Beaver, R. J. (2007). Computer navigation versus
conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone
Joint Surg Br, 89(4), 477–480. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.89b4.18094 - Turgeon, T. R., Cameron, B., Burnell, C. D., Hedden, D. R. & Bohm, E. R. (2019). A double-blind
randomized controlled trial of total knee replacement using patient-specific cutting block
instrumentation versus standard instrumentation. Can J Surg, 62(6), 460–467.
https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018318 - van den Boom, L. G. H., Brouwer, R. W., van den Akker-Scheek, I., Reininga, I. H. F., Vries, A. J. de,
Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A. & van Raay, J. J. A. M. (2020). No Difference in Recovery of PatientReported Outcome and Range of Motion between Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized
Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. The journal of knee
surgery, 33(12), 1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693023 - Varela-Egocheaga, J. R., Suárez-Suárez, M. A., Fernández-Villán, M., González-Sastre, V., VarelaGómez, J. R. & Rodríguez-Merchán, C. (2010). Minimally invasive subvastus approach:
improving the results of total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. Clin Orthop
Relat Res, 468(5), 1200–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1160-8 - Verburg, H., Mathijssen, N. M., Niesten, D. D., Verhaar, J. A. & Pilot, P. (2016). Comparison of MiniMidvastus and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty with Clinical and Radiographic
Evaluation: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with 5-Year Follow-up. The Journal of
bone and joint surgery. American volume, 98(12), 1014–1022.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.00654 - Wülker, N., Lambermont, J. P., Sacchetti, L., Lazaró, J. G. & Nardi, J. (2010). A prospective randomized
study of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional surgery. The
Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 92(7), 1584–1590.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01070
- Abdel, M. P., Tibbo, M. E., Stuart, M. J., Trousdale, R. T., Hanssen, A. D. & Pagnano, M. W. (2018). A
Wundkomplikationen
-
- Aggarwal, A. K. & Agrawal, A. (2013). Mobile vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a
single surgeon: a 4- to 6.5-year randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blinded study.
The Journal of arthroplasty, 28(10), 1712–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.003 - Barrett, W. P., Mason, J. B., Moskal, J. T., Dalury, D. F., Oliashirazi, A. & Fisher, D. A. (2011).
Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs
conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty,
26(8), 1273-1284.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.037 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2019). The clinical and
cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial
compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The
Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2020). Total versus
partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the
TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24200 - Breeman, S., Campbell, M., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
MacLennan, G., Morris, R. & Murray, D. (2011). Patellar resurfacing in total knee
replacement: five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 93(16), 1473–1481.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.J.00725 - Breeman, S., Campbell, M. K., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
MacLennan, G. S., Morris, R. W. & Murray, D. W. (2013). Five-year results of a randomised
controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J,
95-B(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B4.29454 - Breugem, S. J., Sierevelt, I. N., Schafroth, M. U., Blankevoort, L., Schaap, G. R. & van Dijk, C. N. (2008).
Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing
prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(8), 1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6 - Breugem, S. J., van Ooij, B., Haverkamp, D., Sierevelt, I. N. & van Dijk, C. N. (2014). No difference in
anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty
after 7.9 years. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA,
22(3), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2281-2 - Campbell, D. G., Duncan, W. W., Ashworth, M., Mintz, A., Stirling, J., Wakefield, L. & Stevenson, T. M.
(2006). Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: a ten-year randomised prospective
trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88(6), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.88b6.16822 - Chalidis, B. E., Petsatodis, G., Christodoulou, A. G., Christoforidis, J., Papadopoulos, P. P. & Pournaras,
J. (2010). Is obesity a contraindication for minimal invasive total knee replacement? A
prospective randomized control trial. Obes Surg, 20(12), 1633–1641.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9968-6 - Chauhan, S. K., Scott, R. G., Breidahl, W. & Beaver, R. J. (2004). Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty
versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg
Br, 86(3), 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x. - Chawla, L., Bandekar, S. M., Dixit, V., P, A., Krishnamoorthi, A. & Mummigatti, S. (2019). Functional
outcome of patellar resurfacing vs non resurfacing in Total Knee Arthoplasty in elderly: A
prospective five year follow-up study. Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery, 6(1), 65–69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2018.09.006 - Decking, R., Markmann, Y., Fuchs, J., Puhl, W. & Scharf, H. P. (2005). Leg axis after computernavigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-
navigated and manual implantation. The Journal of arthroplasty, 20(3), 282–288.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.047 - Dossett, H. G., Estrada, N. A., Swartz, G. J., LeFevre, G. W. & Kwasman, B. G. (2014). A randomised
controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year
clinical results. Bone Joint J, 96-b(7), 907–913. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b7.32812 - Dowsey, M. M., Gould, D. J., Spelman, T., Pandy, M. G. & Choong, P. F. (2020). A Randomized
Controlled Trial Comparing a Medial Stabilized Total Knee Prosthesis to a Cruciate Retaining
and Posterior Stabilized Design: A Report of the Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following
Total Knee Replacement. The Journal of arthroplasty, 35(6), 1583-1590.e2.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.085 - Gioe, T. J., Glynn, J., Sembrano, J., Suthers, K., Santos, E. R. & Singh, J. (2009). Mobile and fixedbearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective
randomized trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(9), 2104–2112.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01442 - Gøthesen, O., Espehaug, B., Havelin, L. I., Petursson, G., Hallan, G., Strøm, E., Dyrhovden, G. &
Furnes, O. (2014). Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and
conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised
controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 96-b(5), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b5.32516 - Guy, S. P., Farndon, M. A., Conroy, J. L., Bennett, C., Grainger, A. J. & London, N. J. (2012). A
prospective randomised study of minimally invasive midvastus total knee arthroplasty
compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. The Knee, 19(6), 866–871.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.04.009 - Harvie, P., Sloan, K. & Beaver, R. J. (2012). Computer navigation vs conventional total knee
arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial. The Journal of
arthroplasty, 27(5), 667-72.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.009 - Huijbregts, H. J., Khan, R. J., Fick, D. P., Hall, M. J., Punwar, S. A., Sorensen, E., Reid, M. J., Vedove, S.
D. & Haebich, S. (2016). Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee
arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system
with patient-specific instrumentation. Bone Joint J, 98-b(8), 1043–1049.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b8.37240 - Johnston, L., MacLennan, G., McCormack, K., Ramsay, C. & Walker, A. (2009). The Knee Arthroplasty
Trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after
alternative approaches to knee replacement. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American
volume, 91(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.01074 - Juosponis, R., Tarasevicius, S., Smailys, A. & Kalesinskas, R. J. (2009). Functional and radiological
outcome after total knee replacement performed with mini-midvastus or conventional
arthrotomy: controlled randomised trial. Int Orthop, 33(5), 1233–1237.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0630-z - Karachalios, T., Giotikas, D., Roidis, N., Poultsides, L., Bargiotas, K. & Malizos, K. N. (2008). Total knee
replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective
randomised clinical and radiological trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90(5), 584–591.
https://doi.org/10.1302/ - Karpman, R. R. & Smith, H. L. (2009). Comparison of the early results of minimally invasive vs
standard approaches to total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. The
Journal of arthroplasty, 24(5), 681–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.011 - Kolisek, F. R., Bonutti, P. M., Hozack, W. J., Purtill, J., Sharkey, P. F., Zelicof, S. B., Ragland, P. S.,
Kester, M., Mont, M. A. & Rothman, R. H. (2007). Clinical experience using a minimally
invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective
randomized study compared to a standard approach. The Journal of arthroplasty, 22(1), 8–
13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.004 - Kotela, A., Lorkowski, J., Kucharzewski, M., Wilk-Frańczuk, M., Śliwiński, Z., Frańczuk, B., Łęgosz, P. &
Kotela, I. (2015). Patient-Specific CT-Based Instrumentation versus Conventional
Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on
Clinical Outcomes and In-Hospital Data. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 165908.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/165908 - Liow, M. H., Xia, Z., Wong, M. K., Tay, K. J., Yeo, S. J. & Chin, P. L. (2014). Robot-assisted total knee
arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised
study. The Journal of arthroplasty, 29(12), 2373–2377.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.010 - Lützner, J., Günther, K. P. & Kirschner, S. (2010). Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus
conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Knee surgery, sports
traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 18(10), 1339–1344.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1153-x - Molt, M. & Toksvig-Larsen, S. (2014). Similar early migration when comparing CR and PS in
Triathlon™ TKA: A prospective randomised RSA trial. The Knee, 21(5), 949–954.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2014.05.012 - Newman, J., Pydisetty, R. V. & Ackroyd, C. (2009). Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the
15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91(1), 52–
57. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.91b1.20899 - Newman, J. H., Ackroyd, C. E. & Shah, N. A. (1998). Unicompartmental or total knee replacement?
Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with
unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80(5), 862–865.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b5.8835 - Øhrn, F. D., van Leeuwen, J., Tsukanaka, M. & Röhrl, S. M. (2018). A 2-year RSA study of the Vanguard
CR total knee system: A randomized controlled trial comparing patient-specific positioning
guides with conventional technique. Acta Orthop, 89(4), 418–424.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1470866 - Pan, W. M., Li, X. G., Tang, T. S., Qian, Z. L., Zhang, Q. & Zhang, C. M. (2010). Mini-subvastus versus a
standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J
Int Med Res, 38(3), 890–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800315 - Pang, H. N., Yeo, S. J., Chong, H. C., Chin, P. L., Ong, J. & Lo, N. N. (2011). Computer-assisted gap
balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with
conventional measured resection technique. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
: official journal of the ESSKA, 19(9), 1496–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1483-3 - Park, S. E. & Lee, C. T. (2007). Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation
of a primary total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 22(7), 1054–1059.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.036 - Petursson, G., Fenstad, A. M., Gøthesen, Ø., Dyrhovden, G. S., Hallan, G., Röhrl, S. M., Aamodt, A. &
Furnes, O. (2018). Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Replacement:
A Multicenter Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of bone and joint
surgery. American volume, 100(15), 1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01338 - Song, E. K., Seon, J. K., Yim, J. H., Netravali, N. A. & Bargar, W. L. (2013). Robotic-assisted TKA reduces
postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3 - Spencer, J. M., Chauhan, S. K., Sloan, K., Taylor, A. & Beaver, R. J. (2007). Computer navigation versus
conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone
Joint Surg Br, 89(4), 477–480. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.89b4.18094 - Verburg, H., Mathijssen, N. M., Niesten, D. D., Verhaar, J. A. & Pilot, P. (2016). Comparison of MiniMidvastus and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty with Clinical and Radiographic
Evaluation: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with 5-Year Follow-up. The Journal of
bone and joint surgery. American volume, 98(12), 1014–1022.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.00654 - Victor, J. & Hoste, D. (2004). Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower
variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res(428), 131–139.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000147710.69612.76 - Tasker, A., Hassaballa, M., Murray, J., Lancaster, S., Artz, N., Harries, W. & Porteous, A. (2014).
Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting
outcomes up to 2 year follow up. The Knee, 21(1), 189–193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.07.010 - Turgeon, T. R., Cameron, B., Burnell, C. D., Hedden, D. R. & Bohm, E. R. (2019). A double-blind
randomized controlled trial of total knee replacement using patient-specific cutting block
instrumentation versus standard instrumentation. Can J Surg, 62(6), 460–467.
https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018318 - van den Boom, L. G. H., Brouwer, R. W., van den Akker-Scheek, I., Reininga, I. H. F., Vries, A. J. de,
Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A. & van Raay, J. J. A. M. (2020). No Difference in Recovery of PatientReported Outcome and Range of Motion between Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized
Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. The journal of knee
surgery, 33(12), 1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693023. - Varela-Egocheaga, J. R., Suárez-Suárez, M. A., Fernández-Villán, M., González-Sastre, V., VarelaGómez, J. R. & Rodríguez-Merchán, C. (2010). Minimally invasive subvastus approach:
improving the results of total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. Clin Orthop
Relat Res, 468(5), 1200–1208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1160-8 - Wülker, N., Lambermont, J. P., Sacchetti, L., Lazaró, J. G. & Nardi, J. (2010). A prospective randomized
study of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional surgery. The
Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 92(7), 1584–1590.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01070 - Yan, C. H., Chiu, K. Y., Ng, F. Y., Chan, P. K. & Fang, C. X. (2015). Comparison between patient-specific
instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee
arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy :
official journal of the ESSKA, 23(12), 3637–3645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3264-2
- Aggarwal, A. K. & Agrawal, A. (2013). Mobile vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a
Blutergüsse
-
- Boonen, B., Schotanus, M. G. M., Kerens, B., van der Weegen, W., van Drumpt, R. A. M. & Kort, N. P.
(2013). Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific
surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee surgery,
sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 21(10), 2206–2212.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2620-y - Breugem, S. J., Sierevelt, I. N., Schafroth, M. U., Blankevoort, L., Schaap, G. R. & van Dijk, C. N. (2008).
Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing
prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(8), 1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6 - Breugem, S. J., van Ooij, B., Haverkamp, D., Sierevelt, I. N. & van Dijk, C. N. (2014). No difference in
anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty
after 7.9 years. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA,
22(3), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2281-2 - Choong, P. F., Dowsey, M. M. & Stoney, J. D. (2009). Does accurate anatomical alignment result in
better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee
arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 24(4), 560–569.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018 - Dossett, H. G., Estrada, N. A., Swartz, G. J., LeFevre, G. W. & Kwasman, B. G. (2014). A randomised
controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year
clinical results. Bone Joint J, 96-b(7), 907–913. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b7.32812 - Dowsey, M. M., Gould, D. J., Spelman, T., Pandy, M. G. & Choong, P. F. (2020). A Randomized
Controlled Trial Comparing a Medial Stabilized Total Knee Prosthesis to a Cruciate Retaining
and Posterior Stabilized Design: A Report of the Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following
Total Knee Replacement. The Journal of arthroplasty, 35(6), 1583-1590.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.085 - Guy, S. P., Farndon, M. A., Conroy, J. L., Bennett, C., Grainger, A. J. & London, N. J. (2012). A
prospective randomised study of minimally invasive midvastus total knee arthroplasty
compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. The Knee, 19(6), 866–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.04.009 - Huijbregts, H. J., Khan, R. J., Fick, D. P., Hall, M. J., Punwar, S. A., Sorensen, E., Reid, M. J., Vedove, S.
D. & Haebich, S. (2016). Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee
arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system
with patient-specific instrumentation. Bone Joint J, 98-b(8), 1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b8.37240 - Ikawa, T., Takemura, S., Kim, M., Takaoka, K., Minoda, Y. & Kadoya, Y. (2017). Usefulness of an
accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J, 99-
b(8), 1047–1052. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.99b8.Bjj-2016-0596.R3 - Newman, J., Pydisetty, R. V. & Ackroyd, C. (2009). Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the
15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91(1), 52–
57. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.91b1.20899 - Newman, J. H., Ackroyd, C. E. & Shah, N. A. (1998). Unicompartmental or total knee replacement?
Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with
unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80(5), 862–865. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b5.8835 - Øhrn, F. D., van Leeuwen, J., Tsukanaka, M. & Röhrl, S. M. (2018). A 2-year RSA study of the Vanguard
CR total knee system: A randomized controlled trial comparing patient-specific positioning
guides with conventional technique. Acta Orthop, 89(4), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1470866 - van den Boom, L. G. H., Brouwer, R. W., van den Akker-Scheek, I., Reininga, I. H. F., Vries, A. J. de,
Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A. & van Raay, J. J. A. M. (2020). No Difference in Recovery of PatientReported Outcome and Range of Motion between Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized
Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. The journal of knee
surgery, 33(12), 1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693023 - Victor, J. & Hoste, D. (2004). Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower
variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res(428), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000147710.69612.76
- Boonen, B., Schotanus, M. G. M., Kerens, B., van der Weegen, W., van Drumpt, R. A. M. & Kort, N. P.
Knochenbrüche
-
- Aggarwal, A. K. & Agrawal, A. (2013). Mobile vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a
single surgeon: a 4- to 6.5-year randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blinded study.
The Journal of arthroplasty, 28(10), 1712–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.003 - Barrett, W. P., Mason, J. B., Moskal, J. T., Dalury, D. F., Oliashirazi, A. & Fisher, D. A. (2011).
Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs
conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty,
26(8), 1273-1284.e1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.037 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2019). The clinical and
cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial
compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The
Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2020). Total versus
partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the
TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24200 - Breugem, S. J., Sierevelt, I. N., Schafroth, M. U., Blankevoort, L., Schaap, G. R. & van Dijk, C. N. (2008).
Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing
prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(8), 1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6 - Breugem, S. J., van Ooij, B., Haverkamp, D., Sierevelt, I. N. & van Dijk, C. N. (2014). No difference in
anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty
after 7.9 years. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA,
22(3), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2281-2 - Campbell, D. G., Duncan, W. W., Ashworth, M., Mintz, A., Stirling, J., Wakefield, L. & Stevenson, T. M.
(2006). Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: a ten-year randomised prospective
trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88(6), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.88b6.16822 - Chawla, L., Bandekar, S. M., Dixit, V., P, A., Krishnamoorthi, A. & Mummigatti, S. (2019). Functional
outcome of patellar resurfacing vs non resurfacing in Total Knee Arthoplasty in elderly: A
prospective five year follow-up study. Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery, 6(1), 65–69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2018.09.006 - Dossett, H. G., Estrada, N. A., Swartz, G. J., LeFevre, G. W. & Kwasman, B. G. (2014). A randomised
controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year
clinical results. Bone Joint J, 96-b(7), 907–913. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b7.32812 - Gioe, T. J., Glynn, J., Sembrano, J., Suthers, K., Santos, E. R. & Singh, J. (2009). Mobile and fixedbearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective
randomized trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(9), 2104–2112.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01442 - Gøthesen, O., Espehaug, B., Havelin, L. I., Petursson, G., Hallan, G., Strøm, E., Dyrhovden, G. &
Furnes, O. (2014). Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and
conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised
controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 96-b(5), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b5.32516 - Hansson, U., Toksvig-Larsen, S., Jorn, L. P. & Ryd, L. (2005). Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total
knee replacement: a randomised radiostereometric study. The Knee, 12(6), 414–418.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2004.12.002 - Harrington, M. A., Hopkinson, W. J., Hsu, P. & Manion, L. (2009). Fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee
arthroplasty: does it make a difference?–a prospective randomized study. The Journal of
arthroplasty, 24(6 Suppl), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.031 - Ikawa, T., Takemura, S., Kim, M., Takaoka, K., Minoda, Y. & Kadoya, Y. (2017). Usefulness of an
accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J, 99-
b(8), 1047–1052. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.99b8.Bjj-2016-0596.R3 - Jacobs, W. C., Christen, B., Wymenga, A. B., Schuster, A., van der Schaaf, D. B., Ham, A. ten & Wehrli,
U. (2012). Functional performance of mobile versus fixed bearing total knee prostheses: a
randomised controlled trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal
of the ESSKA, 20(8), 1450–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1684-9 - Juosponis, R., Tarasevicius, S., Smailys, A. & Kalesinskas, R. J. (2009). Functional and radiological
outcome after total knee replacement performed with mini-midvastus or conventional
arthrotomy: controlled randomised trial. Int Orthop, 33(5), 1233–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0630-z - Kawakami, Y., Matsumoto, T., Takayama, K., Ishida, K., Nakano, N., Matsushita, T., Kuroda, Y., Patel,
K., Kuroda, R. & Kurosaka, M. (2015). Intermediate-Term Comparison of Posterior CruciateRetaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the New Knee Scoring System. Orthopedics, 38(12), e1127-32. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20151123-03 - Killen, C. J., Murphy, M. P., Hopkinson, W. J., Harrington, M. A., Adams, W. H. & Rees, H. W. (2020).
Minimum twelve-year follow-up of fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Double
blinded randomized trial. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 11(1), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.019 - Kolisek, F. R., Bonutti, P. M., Hozack, W. J., Purtill, J., Sharkey, P. F., Zelicof, S. B., Ragland, P. S.,
Kester, M., Mont, M. A. & Rothman, R. H. (2007). Clinical experience using a minimally
invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective
randomized study compared to a standard approach. The Journal of arthroplasty, 22(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.004 - Newman, J., Pydisetty, R. V. & Ackroyd, C. (2009). Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the
15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.91b1.20899 - Newman, J. H., Ackroyd, C. E. & Shah, N. A. (1998). Unicompartmental or total knee replacement?
Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with
unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80(5), 862–865. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b5.8835 - Park, S. E. & Lee, C. T. (2007). Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation
of a primary total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 22(7), 1054–1059.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.036 - Petursson, G., Fenstad, A. M., Gøthesen, Ø., Dyrhovden, G. S., Hallan, G., Röhrl, S. M., Aamodt, A. &
Furnes, O. (2018). Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Replacement:
A Multicenter Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of bone and joint
surgery. American volume, 100(15), 1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01338 - Vasdev, A., Kumar, S., Chadha, G. & Mandal, S. P. (2009). Fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee
arthroplasty in Indian patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 17(2), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900901700211 - Verburg, H., Mathijssen, N. M., Niesten, D. D., Verhaar, J. A. & Pilot, P. (2016). Comparison of MiniMidvastus and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty with Clinical and Radiographic
Evaluation: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with 5-Year Follow-up. The Journal of
bone and joint surgery. American volume, 98(12), 1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.00654 - Wülker, N., Lambermont, J. P., Sacchetti, L., Lazaró, J. G. & Nardi, J. (2010). A prospective randomized
study of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional surgery. The
Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 92(7), 1584–1590. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01070
- Aggarwal, A. K. & Agrawal, A. (2013). Mobile vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a
Thrombose / Embolie
-
- Aggarwal, A. K. & Agrawal, A. (2013). Mobile vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a
single surgeon: a 4- to 6.5-year randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blinded study.
The Journal of arthroplasty, 28(10), 1712–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.003 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2019). The clinical and
cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial
compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The
Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2020). Total versus
partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the
TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24200 - Blakeney, W. G., Khan, R. J. & Wall, S. J. (2011). Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional
guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 93(15), 1377–1384. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.I.01321 - Boonen, B., Schotanus, M. G., Kerens, B., van der Weegen, W., Hoekstra, H. J. & Kort, N. P. (2016). No
difference in clinical outcome between patient-matched positioning guides and conventional
instrumented total knee arthroplasty two years post-operatively: a multicentre, doubleblind, randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 98-b(7), 939–944.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b7.37274 - Breeman, S., Campbell, M., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
MacLennan, G., Morris, R. & Murray, D. (2011). Patellar resurfacing in total knee
replacement: five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 93(16), 1473–1481. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.J.00725 - Breeman, S., Campbell, M. K., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
MacLennan, G. S., Morris, R. W. & Murray, D. W. (2013). Five-year results of a randomised
controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J, 95-B(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B4.29454 - Campbell, D. G., Duncan, W. W., Ashworth, M., Mintz, A., Stirling, J., Wakefield, L. & Stevenson, T. M.
(2006). Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: a ten-year randomised prospective
trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88(6), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.88b6.16822 - Chalidis, B. E., Petsatodis, G., Christodoulou, A. G., Christoforidis, J., Papadopoulos, P. P. & Pournaras,
J. (2010). Is obesity a contraindication for minimal invasive total knee replacement? A
prospective randomized control trial. Obes Surg, 20(12), 1633–1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9968-6 - Chauhan, S. K., Scott, R. G., Breidahl, W. & Beaver, R. J. (2004). Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty
versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg
Br, 86(3), 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14643 - Choong, P. F., Dowsey, M. M. & Stoney, J. D. (2009). Does accurate anatomical alignment result in
better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee
arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 24(4), 560–569.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018 - Decking, R., Markmann, Y., Fuchs, J., Puhl, W. & Scharf, H. P. (2005). Leg axis after computernavigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computernavigated and manual implantation. The Journal of arthroplasty, 20(3), 282–288.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.047 - Dowsey, M. M., Gould, D. J., Spelman, T., Pandy, M. G. & Choong, P. F. (2020). A Randomized
Controlled Trial Comparing a Medial Stabilized Total Knee Prosthesis to a Cruciate Retaining
and Posterior Stabilized Design: A Report of the Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following
Total Knee Replacement. The Journal of arthroplasty, 35(6), 1583-1590.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.085 - Fricka, K. B., McAsey, C. J. & Sritulanondha, S. (2019). To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 34(7s), S183-s187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.024 - Fricka, K. B., Sritulanondha, S. & McAsey, C. J. (2015). To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty (TKA). The Journal of arthroplasty, 30(9 Suppl), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.049 - Gøthesen, O., Espehaug, B., Havelin, L. I., Petursson, G., Hallan, G., Strøm, E., Dyrhovden, G. &
Furnes, O. (2014). Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and
conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised
controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 96-b(5), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b5.32516 - Guy, S. P., Farndon, M. A., Conroy, J. L., Bennett, C., Grainger, A. J. & London, N. J. (2012). A
prospective randomised study of minimally invasive midvastus total knee arthroplasty
compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. The Knee, 19(6), 866–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.04.009 - Hanusch, B., Lou, T. N., Warriner, G., Hui, A. & Gregg, P. (2010). Functional outcome of PFC Sigma
fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled
trial. Int Orthop, 34(3), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0901-3 - Harrington, M. A., Hopkinson, W. J., Hsu, P. & Manion, L. (2009). Fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee
arthroplasty: does it make a difference?–a prospective randomized study. The Journal of
arthroplasty, 24(6 Suppl), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.031 - Harvie, P., Sloan, K. & Beaver, R. J. (2012). Computer navigation vs conventional total knee
arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial. The Journal of
arthroplasty, 27(5), 667-72.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.009 - Huijbregts, H. J., Khan, R. J., Fick, D. P., Hall, M. J., Punwar, S. A., Sorensen, E., Reid, M. J., Vedove, S.
D. & Haebich, S. (2016). Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee
arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system
with patient-specific instrumentation. Bone Joint J, 98-b(8), 1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b8.37240 - Ikawa, T., Takemura, S., Kim, M., Takaoka, K., Minoda, Y. & Kadoya, Y. (2017). Usefulness of an
accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J, 99-
b(8), 1047–1052. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.99b8.Bjj-2016-0596.R3 - Johnston, L., MacLennan, G., McCormack, K., Ramsay, C. & Walker, A. (2009). The Knee Arthroplasty
Trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after
alternative approaches to knee replacement. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American
volume, 91(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.01074 - Karachalios, T., Giotikas, D., Roidis, N., Poultsides, L., Bargiotas, K. & Malizos, K. N. (2008). Total knee
replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective
randomised clinical and radiological trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90(5), 584–591. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.90b5.20122 - Killen, C. J., Murphy, M. P., Hopkinson, W. J., Harrington, M. A., Adams, W. H. & Rees, H. W. (2020).
Minimum twelve-year follow-up of fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Double
blinded randomized trial. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 11(1), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.019 - Kolisek, F. R., Bonutti, P. M., Hozack, W. J., Purtill, J., Sharkey, P. F., Zelicof, S. B., Ragland, P. S.,
Kester, M., Mont, M. A. & Rothman, R. H. (2007). Clinical experience using a minimally
invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective
randomized study compared to a standard approach. The Journal of arthroplasty, 22(1), 8–
13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.004 - Kotela, A., Lorkowski, J., Kucharzewski, M., Wilk-Frańczuk, M., Śliwiński, Z., Frańczuk, B., Łęgosz, P. &
Kotela, I. (2015). Patient-Specific CT-Based Instrumentation versus Conventional
Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on
Clinical Outcomes and In-Hospital Data. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 165908. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/165908 - Liow, M. H., Xia, Z., Wong, M. K., Tay, K. J., Yeo, S. J. & Chin, P. L. (2014). Robot-assisted total knee
arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised
study. The Journal of arthroplasty, 29(12), 2373–2377.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.010 - Liow, M. H. L., Goh, G. S., Wong, M. K., Chin, P. L., Tay, D. K. & Yeo, S. J. (2017). Robotic-assisted total
knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of
a prospective randomized trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official
journal of the ESSKA, 25(9), 2942–2951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4076-3 - Molt, M. & Toksvig-Larsen, S. (2014). Similar early migration when comparing CR and PS in
Triathlon™ TKA: A prospective randomised RSA trial. The Knee, 21(5), 949–954.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2014.05.012 - NCT02539992. (2012, May – 2015, May). ShapeMatch Cutting Guide Functional Outcomes Study
(ShapeMatch). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02539992?term=NCT02539992&draw=2&rank=1 - Newman, J., Pydisetty, R. V. & Ackroyd, C. (2009). Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the
15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91(1), 52–
57. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.91b1.20899 - Newman, J. H., Ackroyd, C. E. & Shah, N. A. (1998). Unicompartmental or total knee replacement?
Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with
unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80(5), 862–865. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b5.8835 - Pang, H. N., Yeo, S. J., Chong, H. C., Chin, P. L., Ong, J. & Lo, N. N. (2011). Computer-assisted gap
balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with
conventional measured resection technique. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy
: official journal of the ESSKA, 19(9), 1496–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1483-3 - Petursson, G., Fenstad, A. M., Gøthesen, Ø., Dyrhovden, G. S., Hallan, G., Röhrl, S. M., Aamodt, A. &
Furnes, O. (2018). Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Replacement:
A Multicenter Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of bone and joint
surgery. American volume, 100(15), 1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01338 - Song, E. K., Seon, J. K., Yim, J. H., Netravali, N. A. & Bargar, W. L. (2013). Robotic-assisted TKA reduces
postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3 - Spencer, J. M., Chauhan, S. K., Sloan, K., Taylor, A. & Beaver, R. J. (2007). Computer navigation versus
conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone
Joint Surg Br, 89(4), 477–480. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.89b4.18094 - Tasker, A., Hassaballa, M., Murray, J., Lancaster, S., Artz, N., Harries, W. & Porteous, A. (2014).
Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting
outcomes up to 2 year follow up. The Knee, 21(1), 189–193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.07.010 - Turgeon, T. R., Cameron, B., Burnell, C. D., Hedden, D. R. & Bohm, E. R. (2019). A double-blind
randomized controlled trial of total knee replacement using patient-specific cutting block
instrumentation versus standard instrumentation. Can J Surg, 62(6), 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018318 - Vasdev, A., Kumar, S., Chadha, G. & Mandal, S. P. (2009). Fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee
arthroplasty in Indian patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 17(2), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900901700211 - Victor, J. & Hoste, D. (2004). Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower
variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res(428), 131–139.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000147710.69612.76 - Yan, C. H., Chiu, K. Y., Ng, F. Y., Chan, P. K. & Fang, C. X. (2015). Comparison between patient-specific
instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee
arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy :
official journal of the ESSKA, 23(12), 3637–3645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3264-2
- Aggarwal, A. K. & Agrawal, A. (2013). Mobile vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a
Gelenkinfektionen
-
- Abdel, M. P., Tibbo, M. E., Stuart, M. J., Trousdale, R. T., Hanssen, A. D. & Pagnano, M. W. (2018). A
randomized controlled trial of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a followup at a mean of ten years. Bone Joint J, 100-b(7), 925–929. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b7.Bjj-2017-1473.R1 - Aggarwal, A. K. & Agrawal, A. (2013). Mobile vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a
single surgeon: a 4- to 6.5-year randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blinded study.
The Journal of arthroplasty, 28(10), 1712–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.003 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2019). The clinical and
cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial
compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The
Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2020). Total versus
partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the
TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24200 - Blakeney, W. G., Khan, R. J. & Wall, S. J. (2011). Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional
guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 93(15), 1377–1384.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.I.01321 - Boonen, B., Schotanus, M. G., Kerens, B., van der Weegen, W., Hoekstra, H. J. & Kort, N. P. (2016). No
difference in clinical outcome between patient-matched positioning guides and conventional
instrumented total knee arthroplasty two years post-operatively: a multicentre, doubleblind, randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 98-b(7), 939–944.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b7.37274 - Breeman, S., Campbell, M., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
MacLennan, G., Morris, R. & Murray, D. (2011). Patellar resurfacing in total knee
replacement: five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 93(16), 1473–1481.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.J.00725 - Breeman, S., Campbell, M. K., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
MacLennan, G. S., Morris, R. W. & Murray, D. W. (2013). Five-year results of a randomised
controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J,
95-B(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B4.29454 - Breugem, S. J., Sierevelt, I. N., Schafroth, M. U., Blankevoort, L., Schaap, G. R. & van Dijk, C. N. (2008).
Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing
prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(8), 1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6 - Breugem, S. J., van Ooij, B., Haverkamp, D., Sierevelt, I. N. & van Dijk, C. N. (2014). No difference in
anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty
after 7.9 years. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA,
22(3), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2281-2 - Chawla, L., Bandekar, S. M., Dixit, V., P, A., Krishnamoorthi, A. & Mummigatti, S. (2019). Functional
outcome of patellar resurfacing vs non resurfacing in Total Knee Arthoplasty in elderly: A
prospective five year follow-up study. Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery, 6(1), 65–69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2018.09.006 - Choong, P. F., Dowsey, M. M. & Stoney, J. D. (2009). Does accurate anatomical alignment result in
better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee
arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 24(4), 560–569.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018 - Dowsey, M. M., Gould, D. J., Spelman, T., Pandy, M. G. & Choong, P. F. (2020). A Randomized
Controlled Trial Comparing a Medial Stabilized Total Knee Prosthesis to a Cruciate Retaining
and Posterior Stabilized Design: A Report of the Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following
Total Knee Replacement. The Journal of arthroplasty, 35(6), 1583-1590.e2.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.085 - Fricka, K. B., McAsey, C. J. & Sritulanondha, S. (2019). To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 34(7s), S183-s187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.024 - Fricka, K. B., Sritulanondha, S. & McAsey, C. J. (2015). To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty (TKA). The Journal of arthroplasty, 30(9 Suppl), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.049 - Gioe, T. J., Glynn, J., Sembrano, J., Suthers, K., Santos, E. R. & Singh, J. (2009). Mobile and fixedbearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective
randomized trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(9), 2104–2112.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01442 - Gøthesen, O., Espehaug, B., Havelin, L. I., Petursson, G., Hallan, G., Strøm, E., Dyrhovden, G. &
Furnes, O. (2014). Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and
conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised
controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 96-b(5), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b5.32516 - Hanusch, B., Lou, T. N., Warriner, G., Hui, A. & Gregg, P. (2010). Functional outcome of PFC Sigma
fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled
trial. Int Orthop, 34(3), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0901-3 - Harrington, M. A., Hopkinson, W. J., Hsu, P. & Manion, L. (2009). Fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee
arthroplasty: does it make a difference?–a prospective randomized study. The Journal of
arthroplasty, 24(6 Suppl), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.031 - Huijbregts, H. J., Khan, R. J., Fick, D. P., Hall, M. J., Punwar, S. A., Sorensen, E., Reid, M. J., Vedove, S.
D. & Haebich, S. (2016). Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee
arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system
with patient-specific instrumentation. Bone Joint J, 98-b(8), 1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b8.37240 - Ikawa, T., Takemura, S., Kim, M., Takaoka, K., Minoda, Y. & Kadoya, Y. (2017). Usefulness of an
accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J, 99-
b(8), 1047–1052. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.99b8.Bjj-2016-0596.R3 - Jacobs, W. C., Christen, B., Wymenga, A. B., Schuster, A., van der Schaaf, D. B., Ham, A. ten & Wehrli,
U. (2012). Functional performance of mobile versus fixed bearing total knee prostheses: a
randomised controlled trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal
of the ESSKA, 20(8), 1450–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1684-9 - Johnston, L., MacLennan, G., McCormack, K., Ramsay, C. & Walker, A. (2009). The Knee Arthroplasty
Trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after
alternative approaches to knee replacement. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American
volume, 91(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.01074 - Kalisvaart, M. M., Pagnano, M. W., Trousdale, R. T., Stuart, M. J. & Hanssen, A. D. (2012). Randomized
clinical trial of rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no clinically
detectable differences at five years. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume,
94(6), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.K.00315 - Karachalios, T., Giotikas, D., Roidis, N., Poultsides, L., Bargiotas, K. & Malizos, K. N. (2008). Total knee
replacement performed with either a mini-midvastus or a standard approach: a prospective
randomised clinical and radiological trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90(5), 584–591. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.90b5.20122 - Karpman, R. R. & Smith, H. L. (2009). Comparison of the early results of minimally invasive vs
standard approaches to total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. The
Journal of arthroplasty, 24(5), 681–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.011 - Killen, C. J., Murphy, M. P., Hopkinson, W. J., Harrington, M. A., Adams, W. H. & Rees, H. W. (2020).
Minimum twelve-year follow-up of fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Double
blinded randomized trial. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 11(1), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.019 - Kolisek, F. R., Bonutti, P. M., Hozack, W. J., Purtill, J., Sharkey, P. F., Zelicof, S. B., Ragland, P. S.,
Kester, M., Mont, M. A. & Rothman, R. H. (2007). Clinical experience using a minimally
invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective
randomized study compared to a standard approach. The Journal of arthroplasty, 22(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.004 - Lee, W. T., Chin, P. L., Lo, N. N. & Yeo, S. J. (2015). Short-term outcome after computer-assisted
versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Surg
(Hong Kong), 23(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901502300117 - Liow, M. H., Xia, Z., Wong, M. K., Tay, K. J., Yeo, S. J. & Chin, P. L. (2014). Robot-assisted total knee
arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised
study. The Journal of arthroplasty, 29(12), 2373–2377.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.010 - Liow, M. H. L., Goh, G. S., Wong, M. K., Chin, P. L., Tay, D. K. & Yeo, S. J. (2017). Robotic-assisted total
knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of
a prospective randomized trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official
journal of the ESSKA, 25(9), 2942–2951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4076-3 - Lizaur-Utrilla, A., Sanz-Reig, J. & Trigueros-Rentero, M. A. (2012). Greater satisfaction in older
patients with a mobile-bearing compared with fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty. The
Journal of arthroplasty, 27(2), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.05.021 - Lützner, J., Günther, K. P. & Kirschner, S. (2010). Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus
conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Knee surgery, sports
traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 18(10), 1339–1344.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1153-x - Nam, D., Lawrie, C. M., Salih, R., Nahhas, C. R., Barrack, R. L. & Nunley, R. M. (2019). Cemented
Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty of the Same Modern Design: A Prospective,
Randomized Trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 101(13), 1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.18.01162 - Pan, W. M., Li, X. G., Tang, T. S., Qian, Z. L., Zhang, Q. & Zhang, C. M. (2010). Mini-subvastus versus a
standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J
Int Med Res, 38(3), 890–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800315 - Petursson, G., Fenstad, A. M., Gøthesen, Ø., Dyrhovden, G. S., Hallan, G., Röhrl, S. M., Aamodt, A. &
Furnes, O. (2018). Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Replacement:
A Multicenter Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of bone and joint
surgery. American volume, 100(15), 1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01338 - Turgeon, T. R., Cameron, B., Burnell, C. D., Hedden, D. R. & Bohm, E. R. (2019). A double-blind
randomized controlled trial of total knee replacement using patient-specific cutting block
instrumentation versus standard instrumentation. Can J Surg, 62(6), 460–467.
https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018318 - van den Boom, L. G. H., Brouwer, R. W., van den Akker-Scheek, I., Reininga, I. H. F., Vries, A. J. de,
Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A. & van Raay, J. J. A. M. (2020). No Difference in Recovery of PatientReported Outcome and Range of Motion between Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized
Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. The journal of knee
surgery, 33(12), 1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693023 - Zeng, Y. M., Yan, M. N., Li, H. W., Zhang, J. & Wang, Y. (2020). Does mobile-bearing have better
flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised
controlled study based on gait. J Orthop Translat, 20, 86–93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.07.009
- Abdel, M. P., Tibbo, M. E., Stuart, M. J., Trousdale, R. T., Hanssen, A. D. & Pagnano, M. W. (2018). A
Beeinträchtigungen des Nervensystems
-
- Pan, W. M., Li, X. G., Tang, T. S., Qian, Z. L., Zhang, Q. & Zhang, C. M. (2010). Mini-subvastus versus a
standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J
Int Med Res, 38(3), 890–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800315
Park, S. E. & Lee, C. T. (2007). Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation
of a primary total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 22(7), 1054–1059.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.036 - Song, E. K., Seon, J. K., Yim, J. H., Netravali, N. A. & Bargar, W. L. (2013). Robotic-assisted TKA reduces
postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3
- Pan, W. M., Li, X. G., Tang, T. S., Qian, Z. L., Zhang, Q. & Zhang, C. M. (2010). Mini-subvastus versus a
Verletzung des Streckapparates
-
- Barrett, W. P., Mason, J. B., Moskal, J. T., Dalury, D. F., Oliashirazi, A. & Fisher, D. A. (2011).
Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs
conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty,
26(8), 1273-1284.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.037 - Chalidis, B. E., Petsatodis, G., Christodoulou, A. G., Christoforidis, J., Papadopoulos, P. P. & Pournaras,
J. (2010). Is obesity a contraindication for minimal invasive total knee replacement? A
prospective randomized control trial. Obes Surg, 20(12), 1633–1641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9968-6 - Chawla, L., Bandekar, S. M., Dixit, V., P, A., Krishnamoorthi, A. & Mummigatti, S. (2019). Functional
outcome of patellar resurfacing vs non resurfacing in Total Knee Arthoplasty in elderly: A
prospective five year follow-up study. Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery, 6(1), 65–69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2018.09.006 - Fricka, K. B., McAsey, C. J. & Sritulanondha, S. (2019). To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 34(7s), S183-s187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.024 - Fricka, K. B., Sritulanondha, S. & McAsey, C. J. (2015). To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty (TKA). The Journal of arthroplasty, 30(9 Suppl), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.049 - Gioe, T. J., Glynn, J., Sembrano, J., Suthers, K., Santos, E. R. & Singh, J. (2009). Mobile and fixedbearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective
randomized trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(9), 2104–2112 https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01442 - Pan, W. M., Li, X. G., Tang, T. S., Qian, Z. L., Zhang, Q. & Zhang, C. M. (2010). Mini-subvastus versus a
standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J
Int Med Res, 38(3), 890–900 https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800315 - Park, S. E. & Lee, C. T. (2007). Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional manual implantation
of a primary total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 22(7), 1054–1059.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.036 - Song, E. K., Seon, J. K., Yim, J. H., Netravali, N. A. & Bargar, W. L. (2013). Robotic-assisted TKA reduces
postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3 - Verburg, H., Mathijssen, N. M., Niesten, D. D., Verhaar, J. A. & Pilot, P. (2016). Comparison of MiniMidvastus and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty with Clinical and Radiographic
Evaluation: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with 5-Year Follow-up. The Journal of
bone and joint surgery. American volume, 98(12), 1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.00654
- Barrett, W. P., Mason, J. B., Moskal, J. T., Dalury, D. F., Oliashirazi, A. & Fisher, D. A. (2011).
Lockerung der Prothese
-
- Abdel, M. P., Tibbo, M. E., Stuart, M. J., Trousdale, R. T., Hanssen, A. D. & Pagnano, M. W. (2018). A
randomized controlled trial of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a followup at a mean of ten years. Bone Joint J, 100-b(7), 925–929. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b7.Bjj-2017-1473.R1 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2019). The clinical and
cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial
compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The
Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2020). Total versus
partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the
TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24200 - Breeman, S., Campbell, M. K., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
MacLennan, G. S., Morris, R. W. & Murray, D. W. (2013). Five-year results of a randomised
controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J,
95-B(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B4.29454 - Breugem, S. J., Sierevelt, I. N., Schafroth, M. U., Blankevoort, L., Schaap, G. R. & van Dijk, C. N. (2008).
Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing
prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(8), 1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6 - Breugem, S. J., van Ooij, B., Haverkamp, D., Sierevelt, I. N. & van Dijk, C. N. (2014). No difference in
anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty
after 7.9 years. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA,
22(3), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2281-2 - Campbell, D. G., Duncan, W. W., Ashworth, M., Mintz, A., Stirling, J., Wakefield, L. & Stevenson, T. M.
(2006). Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: a ten-year randomised prospective
trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88(6), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.88b6.16822 - Chawla, L., Bandekar, S. M., Dixit, V., P, A., Krishnamoorthi, A. & Mummigatti, S. (2019). Functional
outcome of patellar resurfacing vs non resurfacing in Total Knee Arthoplasty in elderly: A
prospective five year follow-up study. Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery, 6(1), 65–69.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2018.09.006 - Feczko, P. Z., Jutten, L. M., van Steyn, M. J., Deckers, P., Emans, P. J. & Arts, J. J. (2017). Comparison
of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in terms of patellofemoral pain and
function: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 18(1), 279.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1635-9 - Fricka, K. B., McAsey, C. J. & Sritulanondha, S. (2019). To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 34(7s), S183-s187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.024 - Fricka, K. B., Sritulanondha, S. & McAsey, C. J. (2015). To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty (TKA). The Journal of arthroplasty, 30(9 Suppl), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.049 - Gioe, T. J., Glynn, J., Sembrano, J., Suthers, K., Santos, E. R. & Singh, J. (2009). Mobile and fixedbearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective
randomized trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(9), 2104–2112.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01442 - Grodzki, T., Haak, H., Behrendt, R., Merk, H. & Krauspe, R. (2001) [Prospective randomized
comparative study of early functional outcome of 2 knee joint endoprosthesis systems–
rotation plateau versus fixed polyethylene inlay]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 139(5), 393–396. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-17980 - Harrington, M. A., Hopkinson, W. J., Hsu, P. & Manion, L. (2009). Fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee
arthroplasty: does it make a difference?–a prospective randomized study. The Journal of
arthroplasty, 24(6 Suppl), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.031 - Jacobs, W. C., Christen, B., Wymenga, A. B., Schuster, A., van der Schaaf, D. B., Ham, A. ten & Wehrli,
U. (2012). Functional performance of mobile versus fixed bearing total knee prostheses: a
randomised controlled trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal
of the ESSKA, 20(8), 1450–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1684-9 - Kalisvaart, M. M., Pagnano, M. W., Trousdale, R. T., Stuart, M. J. & Hanssen, A. D. (2012). Randomized
clinical trial of rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no clinically
detectable differences at five years. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume,
94(6), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.K.00315 - Killen, C. J., Murphy, M. P., Hopkinson, W. J., Harrington, M. A., Adams, W. H. & Rees, H. W. (2020).
Minimum twelve-year follow-up of fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Double
blinded randomized trial. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 11(1), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.019 - Lizaur-Utrilla, A., Sanz-Reig, J. & Trigueros-Rentero, M. A. (2012). Greater satisfaction in older
patients with a mobile-bearing compared with fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty. The
Journal of arthroplasty, 27(2), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.05.021 - Pan, W. M., Li, X. G., Tang, T. S., Qian, Z. L., Zhang, Q. & Zhang, C. M. (2010). Mini-subvastus versus a
standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J
Int Med Res, 38(3), 890–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800315 - Poirier, N., Graf, P. & Dubrana, F. (2015). Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee implants.
Results of a series of 100 randomised cases after 9 years follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg
Res, 101(4 Suppl), S187-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.03.004 - Raaij, T. M. V., Meij, E. V., Vries, A. J. & Raay, J. (2020). Patellar Resurfacing Does Not Improve Clinical
Outcome in Patients with Symptomatic Tricompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis. An RCT Study
of 40 Patients Receiving Primary Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty. The journal of
knee surgery. Vorab-Onlinepublikation. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1710369 - Tasker, A., Hassaballa, M., Murray, J., Lancaster, S., Artz, N., Harries, W. & Porteous, A. (2014).
Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting
outcomes up to 2 year follow up. The Knee, 21(1), 189–193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.07.010 - Turgeon, T. R., Cameron, B., Burnell, C. D., Hedden, D. R. & Bohm, E. R. (2019). A double-blind
randomized controlled trial of total knee replacement using patient-specific cutting block
instrumentation versus standard instrumentation. Can J Surg, 62(6), 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018318 - Verburg, H., Mathijssen, N. M., Niesten, D. D., Verhaar, J. A. & Pilot, P. (2016). Comparison of MiniMidvastus and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty with Clinical and Radiographic
Evaluation: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with 5-Year Follow-up. The Journal of
bone and joint surgery. American volume, 98(12), 1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.00654 - Woolson, S. T., Harris, A. H., Wagner, D. W. & Giori, N. J. (2014). Component alignment during total
knee arthroplasty with use of standard or custom instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial
using computed tomography for postoperative alignment measurement. The Journal of bone
and joint surgery. American volume, 96(5), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.L.01722 - Zeng, Y. M., Yan, M. N., Li, H. W., Zhang, J. & Wang, Y. (2020). Does mobile-bearing have better
flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised
controlled study based on gait. J Orthop Translat, 20, 86–93.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.07.009
- Abdel, M. P., Tibbo, M. E., Stuart, M. J., Trousdale, R. T., Hanssen, A. D. & Pagnano, M. W. (2018). A
Schwellungen
-
- Beard 2019 , D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2019). The clinical and
cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial
compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The
Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4 - Beard 2020, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2020). Total versus
partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the
TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24200 - Boonen 2016, B., Schotanus, M. G., Kerens, B., van der Weegen, W., Hoekstra, H. J. & Kort, N. P. (2016). No
difference in clinical outcome between patient-matched positioning guides and conventional
instrumented total knee arthroplasty two years post-operatively: a multicentre, doubleblind, randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 98-b(7), 939–944.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b7.37274 - Kosse 2018, N. M., Heesterbeek, P. J. C., Schimmel, J. J. P., van Hellemondt, G. G., Wymenga, A. B. &
Defoort, K. C. (2018). Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific
instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee surgery,
sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 26(6), 1792–1799.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4792-3 - Kotela 2015, A., Lorkowski, J., Kucharzewski, M., Wilk-Frańczuk, M., Śliwiński, Z., Frańczuk, B., Łęgosz, P. &
Kotela, I. (2015). Patient-Specific CT-Based Instrumentation versus Conventional
Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study on
Clinical Outcomes and In-Hospital Data. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 165908. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/165908
- Beard 2019 , D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Abweichungen in der Ausrichtung
-
- Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2019). The clinical and
cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial
compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The
Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2020). Total versus
partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the
TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24200 - Boonen, B., Schotanus, M. G., Kerens, B., van der Weegen, W., Hoekstra, H. J. & Kort, N. P. (2016). No
difference in clinical outcome between patient-matched positioning guides and conventional
instrumented total knee arthroplasty two years post-operatively: a multicentre, doubleblind, randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 98-b(7), 939–944.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b7.37274 - Juosponis, R., Tarasevicius, S., Smailys, A. & Kalesinskas, R. J. (2009). Functional and radiological
outcome after total knee replacement performed with mini-midvastus or conventional
arthrotomy: controlled randomised trial. Int Orthop, 33(5), 1233–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0630-z - Liow, M. H., Xia, Z., Wong, M. K., Tay, K. J., Yeo, S. J. & Chin, P. L. (2014). Robot-assisted total knee
arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised
study. The Journal of arthroplasty, 29(12), 2373–2377.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.010 - Liow, M. H. L., Goh, G. S., Wong, M. K., Chin, P. L., Tay, D. K. & Yeo, S. J. (2017). Robotic-assisted total
knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of
a prospective randomized trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official
journal of the ESSKA, 25(9), 2942–2951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4076-3 - Pan, W. M., Li, X. G., Tang, T. S., Qian, Z. L., Zhang, Q. & Zhang, C. M. (2010). Mini-subvastus versus a
standard approach in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J
Int Med Res, 38(3), 890–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800315
- Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Verletzungen des Innenbandes
-
- Breugem, S. J., Sierevelt, I. N., Schafroth, M. U., Blankevoort, L., Schaap, G. R. & van Dijk, C. N. (2008).
Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing
prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(8), 1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6 - Breugem, S. J., van Ooij, B., Haverkamp, D., Sierevelt, I. N. & van Dijk, C. N. (2014). No difference in
anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty
after 7.9 years. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA,
22(3), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2281-2 - Fricka, K. B., McAsey, C. J. & Sritulanondha, S. (2019). To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 34(7s), S183-s187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.024 - Fricka, K. B., Sritulanondha, S. & McAsey, C. J. (2015). To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty (TKA). The Journal of arthroplasty, 30(9 Suppl), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.049 - Guy, S. P., Farndon, M. A., Conroy, J. L., Bennett, C., Grainger, A. J. & London, N. J. (2012). A
prospective randomised study of minimally invasive midvastus total knee arthroplasty
compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. The Knee, 19(6), 866–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.04.009 - Vasdev, A., Kumar, S., Chadha, G. & Mandal, S. P. (2009). Fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee
arthroplasty in Indian patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 17(2), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900901700211
- Breugem, S. J., Sierevelt, I. N., Schafroth, M. U., Blankevoort, L., Schaap, G. R. & van Dijk, C. N. (2008).
Instabilität
-
- Aggarwal, A. K. & Agrawal, A. (2013). Mobile vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a
single surgeon: a 4- to 6.5-year randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blinded study.
The Journal of arthroplasty, 28(10), 1712–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.003 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2019). The clinical and
cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial
compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The
Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2020). Total versus
partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the
TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24200 - Breeman, S., Campbell, M. K., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
MacLennan, G. S., Morris, R. W. & Murray, D. W. (2013). Five-year results of a randomised
controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J,
95-B(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B4.29454 - Fricka, K. B., McAsey, C. J. & Sritulanondha, S. (2019). To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 34(7s), S183-s187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.024 - Fricka, K. B., Sritulanondha, S. & McAsey, C. J. (2015). To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a
Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee
Arthroplasty (TKA). The Journal of arthroplasty, 30(9 Suppl), 55–58.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.049 - Gioe, T. J., Glynn, J., Sembrano, J., Suthers, K., Santos, E. R. & Singh, J. (2009). Mobile and fixedbearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective
randomized trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(9), 2104–2112.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01442 - Hansson, U., Toksvig-Larsen, S., Jorn, L. P. & Ryd, L. (2005). Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total
knee replacement: a randomised radiostereometric study. The Knee, 12(6), 414–418.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2004.12.002 - Jolles, B. M., Grzesiak, A., Eudier, A., Dejnabadi, H., Voracek, C., Pichonnaz, C., Aminian, K. & Martin,
E. (2012). A randomised controlled clinical trial and gait analysis of fixed- and mobile-bearing
total knee replacements with a five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 94(5), 648–655.
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.94b5.27598 - NCT02539992. (2012, May – 2015, May). ShapeMatch Cutting Guide Functional Outcomes Study
(ShapeMatch).
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02539992?term=NCT02539992&draw=2&rank=1 - Schotanus, M. G. M., Boonen, B., van der Weegen, W., Hoekstra, H., van Drumpt, R., Borghans, R.,
Vos, R., van Rhijn, L. & Kort, N. P. (2019). No difference in mid-term survival and clinical
outcome between patient-specific and conventional instrumented total knee arthroplasty: a
randomized controlled trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal
of the ESSKA, 27(5), 1463–1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4968-5 - Verburg, H., Mathijssen, N. M., Niesten, D. D., Verhaar, J. A. & Pilot, P. (2016). Comparison of MiniMidvastus and Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty with Clinical and Radiographic
Evaluation: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with 5-Year Follow-up. The Journal of
bone and joint surgery. American volume, 98(12), 1014–1022. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.00654 - Wülker, N., Lambermont, J. P., Sacchetti, L., Lazaró, J. G. & Nardi, J. (2010). A prospective randomized
study of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional surgery. The
Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 92(7), 1584–1590. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01070
- Aggarwal, A. K. & Agrawal, A. (2013). Mobile vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a
Abnutzung der Kunststoffgleitfläche
-
- Campbell, D. G., Duncan, W. W., Ashworth, M., Mintz, A., Stirling, J., Wakefield, L. & Stevenson, T. M.
(2006). Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: a ten-year randomised prospective
trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88(6), 734–739. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.88b6.16822
Newman, J., Pydisetty, R. V. & Ackroyd, C. (2009). Unicompartmental or total knee replacement: the
15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91(1), 52–
57. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.91b1.20899 - Newman, J. H., Ackroyd, C. E. & Shah, N. A. (1998). Unicompartmental or total knee replacement?
Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with
unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80(5), 862–865. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b5.8835
- Campbell, D. G., Duncan, W. W., Ashworth, M., Mintz, A., Stirling, J., Wakefield, L. & Stevenson, T. M.
Mechanische Kniegeräusche
-
- Abdel, M. P., Tibbo, M. E., Stuart, M. J., Trousdale, R. T., Hanssen, A. D. & Pagnano, M. W. (2018). A
randomized controlled trial of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a followup at a mean of ten years. Bone Joint J, 100-b(7), 925–929. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b7.Bjj-2017-1473.R1 - Barrett, W. P., Mason, J. B., Moskal, J. T., Dalury, D. F., Oliashirazi, A. & Fisher, D. A. (2011).
Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs
conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty,
26(8), 1273-1284.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.037 - Gioe, T. J., Glynn, J., Sembrano, J., Suthers, K., Santos, E. R. & Singh, J. (2009). Mobile and fixedbearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective
randomized trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(9), 2104–2112.
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01442 - Kalisvaart, M. M., Pagnano, M. W., Trousdale, R. T., Stuart, M. J. & Hanssen, A. D. (2012). Randomized
clinical trial of rotating-platform and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no clinically
detectable differences at five years. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume,
94(6), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.K.00315 - Kawakami, Y., Matsumoto, T., Takayama, K., Ishida, K., Nakano, N., Matsushita, T., Kuroda, Y., Patel,
K., Kuroda, R. & Kurosaka, M. (2015). Intermediate-Term Comparison of Posterior CruciateRetaining Versus Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the New Knee Scoring
System. Orthopedics, 38(12), e1127-32. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20151123-03 - Song, E. K., Seon, J. K., Yim, J. H., Netravali, N. A. & Bargar, W. L. (2013). Robotic-assisted TKA reduces
postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471(1), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3
- Abdel, M. P., Tibbo, M. E., Stuart, M. J., Trousdale, R. T., Hanssen, A. D. & Pagnano, M. W. (2018). A
Ablösen der Kunststoffgleitfläche
-
- Aggarwal, A. K. & Agrawal, A. (2013). Mobile vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a
single surgeon: a 4- to 6.5-year randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blinded study.
The Journal of arthroplasty, 28(10), 1712–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.003 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2019). The clinical and
cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial
compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The
Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4 - Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J.,
Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2020). Total versus
partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the
TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24200 - Hansson, U., Toksvig-Larsen, S., Jorn, L. P. & Ryd, L. (2005). Mobile vs. fixed meniscal bearing in total
knee replacement: a randomised radiostereometric study. The Knee, 12(6), 414–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2004.12.002 - Hanusch, B., Lou, T. N., Warriner, G., Hui, A. & Gregg, P. (2010). Functional outcome of PFC Sigma
fixed and rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomised controlled
trial. Int Orthop, 34(3), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0901-3 - Harrington, M. A., Hopkinson, W. J., Hsu, P. & Manion, L. (2009). Fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee
arthroplasty: does it make a difference?–a prospective randomized study. The Journal of
arthroplasty, 24(6 Suppl), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.031 - Ikawa, T., Takemura, S., Kim, M., Takaoka, K., Minoda, Y. & Kadoya, Y. (2017). Usefulness of an
accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J, 99-
b(8), 1047–1052. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.99b8.Bjj-2016-0596.R3 - Killen, C. J., Murphy, M. P., Hopkinson, W. J., Harrington, M. A., Adams, W. H. & Rees, H. W. (2020).
Minimum twelve-year follow-up of fixed- vs mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: Double
blinded randomized trial. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 11(1), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2019.03.019 - Poirier, N., Graf, P. & Dubrana, F. (2015). Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee implants.
Results of a series of 100 randomised cases after 9 years follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg
Res, 101(4 Suppl), S187-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.03.004 - Victor, J. & Hoste, D. (2004). Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower
variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res(428), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000147710.69612.76 - Zeng, Y. M., Yan, M. N., Li, H. W., Zhang, J. & Wang, Y. (2020). Does mobile-bearing have better
flexion and axial rotation than fixed-bearing in total knee arthroplasty? A randomised
controlled study based on gait. J Orthop Translat, 20, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2019.07.009
- Aggarwal, A. K. & Agrawal, A. (2013). Mobile vs fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a
Verrenkungen ohne nähere Bezeichnung
-
- Breeman, S., Campbell, M., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
MacLennan, G., Morris, R. & Murray, D. (2011). Patellar resurfacing in total knee
replacement: five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial.
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 93(16), 1473–1481. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.J.00725 - Breeman, S., Campbell, M. K., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
MacLennan, G. S., Morris, R. W. & Murray, D. W. (2013). Five-year results of a randomised
controlled trial comparing mobile and fixed bearings in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J,
95-B(4), 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B4.29454 - Johnston, L., MacLennan, G., McCormack, K., Ramsay, C. & Walker, A. (2009). The Knee Arthroplasty
Trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after
alternative approaches to knee replacement. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American
volume, 91(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.01074
- Breeman, S., Campbell, M., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L.,
Ausrenken des Kniegelenks
-
- Breugem, S. J., Sierevelt, I. N., Schafroth, M. U., Blankevoort, L., Schaap, G. R. & van Dijk, C. N. (2008). Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 466(8), 1959–1965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0320-6
- Breugem, S. J., van Ooij, B., Haverkamp, D., Sierevelt, I. N. & van Dijk, C. N. (2014). No difference in anterior knee pain between a fixed and a mobile posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after 7.9 years. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 22(3), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2281-2
- Grodzki, T., Haak, H., Behrendt, R., Merk, H. & Krauspe, R. (2001) [Prospective randomized comparative study of early functional outcome of 2 knee joint endoprosthesis systems–rotation plateau versus fixed polyethylene inlay]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 139(5), 393–396. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-17980
- van den Boom, L. G. H., Brouwer, R. W., van den Akker-Scheek, I., Reininga, I. H. F., Vries, A. J. de, Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A. & van Raay, J. J. A. M. (2020). No Difference in Recovery of Patient-Reported Outcome and Range of Motion between Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. The journal of knee surgery, 33(12), 1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693023
Gefäßverletzungen
-
- …
Schwächung oder Auflösung der Knochenstruktur (Osteolyse)
-
- Gioe, T. J., Glynn, J., Sembrano, J., Suthers, K., Santos, E. R. & Singh, J. (2009). Mobile and fixed-bearing (all-polyethylene tibial component) total knee arthroplasty designs. A prospective randomized trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(9), 2104–2112. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.H.01442
- Poirier, N., Graf, P. & Dubrana, F. (2015). Mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing total knee implants. Results of a series of 100 randomised cases after 9 years follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 101(4 Suppl), S187-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.03.004
Austausch von Prothesenteilen (Allgemein)
-
- Gøthesen, O., Espehaug, B., Havelin, L. I., Petursson, G., Hallan, G., Strøm, E., Dyrhovden, G. & Furnes, O. (2014). Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 96-b(5), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301- 620x.96b5.32516
- Grimberg, A., Jansson, V., Lützner, J., Melsheimer, O., Morlock, M., Steinbrück, A. (2021). Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD) – Jahresbericht 2021. DOI: 10.36186/reporteprd042021
- Grodzki, T., Haak, H., Behrendt, R., Merk, H. & Krauspe, R. (2001) [Prospective randomized comparative study of early functional outcome of 2 knee joint endoprosthesis systems– rotation plateau versus fixed polyethylene inlay]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 139(5), 393–396. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-17980
Weitere mögliche Komplikationen und unerwünschte Ereignisse
-
- Barrett, W. P., Mason, J. B., Moskal, J. T., Dalury, D. F., Oliashirazi, A. & Fisher, D. A. (2011). Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 26(8), 1273-1284.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.037
- Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J., Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2019). The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4
- Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J., Campbell, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Arden, N., Murray, D. & Campbell, M. K. (2020). Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24200
- Breeman, S., Campbell, M., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L., MacLennan, G., Morris, R. & Murray, D. (2011). Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 93(16), 1473–1481. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.J.00725
- Chauhan, S. K., Scott, R. G., Breidahl, W. & Beaver, R. J. (2004). Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 86(3), 372–377. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14643
- Chawla, L., Bandekar, S. M., Dixit, V., P, A., Krishnamoorthi, A. & Mummigatti, S. (2019). Functional outcome of patellar resurfacing vs non resurfacing in Total Knee Arthoplasty in elderly: A prospective five year follow-up study. Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery, 6(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2018.09.006
- Choong, P. F., Dowsey, M. M. & Stoney, J. D. (2009). Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 24(4), 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018
- Cucchi, D., Menon, A., Aliprandi, A., Soncini, G., Zanini, B., Ragone, V., Compagnoni, R., Ferrua, P., Fossati, C. & Randelli, P. (2019). Patient-specific Instrumentation Affects Rotational Alignment of the Femoral Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Orthopaedic surgery, 11(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12420
- Dowsey, M. M., Gould, D. J., Spelman, T., Pandy, M. G. & Choong, P. F. (2020). A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Medial Stabilized Total Knee Prosthesis to a Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Design: A Report of the Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Total Knee Replacement. The Journal of arthroplasty, 35(6), 1583-1590.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.085
- Fricka, K. B., McAsey, C. J. & Sritulanondha, S. (2019). To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 34(7s), S183-s187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.024
- Fricka, K. B., Sritulanondha, S. & McAsey, C. J. (2015). To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The Journal of arthroplasty, 30(9 Suppl), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.049
- Gelse, K., Katzer, A. & Pförringer, W. (2020). Kniegelenksendoprothese (Ersatzt des Kniegelenks): Dokumentierte Patientenaufklärung. Thieme Compliance GmbH.
Gøthesen, O., Espehaug, B., Havelin, L. I., Petursson, G., Hallan, G., Strøm, E., Dyrhovden, G. & Furnes, O. (2014). Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 96-b(5), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b5.32516 - Harvie, P., Sloan, K. & Beaver, R. J. (2012). Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial. The Journal of arthroplasty, 27(5), 667-72.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.009
- Huijbregts, H. J., Khan, R. J., Fick, D. P., Hall, M. J., Punwar, S. A., Sorensen, E., Reid, M. J., Vedove, S. D. & Haebich, S. (2016). Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system with patient-specific instrumentation. Bone Joint J, 98-b(8), 1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b8.37240
- Johnston, L., MacLennan, G., McCormack, K., Ramsay, C. & Walker, A. (2009). The Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after alternative approaches to knee replacement. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.01074
- Kolisek, F. R., Bonutti, P. M., Hozack, W. J., Purtill, J., Sharkey, P. F., Zelicof, S. B., Ragland, P. S., Kester, M., Mont, M. A. & Rothman, R. H. (2007). Clinical experience using a minimally invasive surgical approach for total knee arthroplasty: early results of a prospective randomized study compared to a standard approach. The Journal of arthroplasty, 22(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.004
- Liow, M. H., Xia, Z., Wong, M. K., Tay, K. J., Yeo, S. J. & Chin, P. L. (2014). Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. The Journal of arthroplasty, 29(12), 2373–2377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.010
- Liow, M. H. L., Goh, G. S., Wong, M. K., Chin, P. L., Tay, D. K. & Yeo, S. J. (2017). Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of
a prospective randomized trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 25(9), 2942–2951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4076-3 - Petursson, G., Fenstad, A. M., Gøthesen, Ø., Dyrhovden, G. S., Hallan, G., Röhrl, S. M., Aamodt, A. & Furnes, O. (2018). Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Replacement: A Multicenter Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 100(15), 1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01338
- Skou, S. T., Roos, E. M., Laursen, M. B., Rathleff, M. S., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Simonsen, O. & Rasmussen, S. (2015). A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Total Knee Replacement. N Engl J Med, 373(17), 1597–1606. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1505467
- Spencer, J. M., Chauhan, S. K., Sloan, K., Taylor, A. & Beaver, R. J. (2007). Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89(4), 477–480. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.89b4.18094
- Tasker, A., Hassaballa, M., Murray, J., Lancaster, S., Artz, N., Harries, W. & Porteous, A. (2014). Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty; a pragmatic randomised controlled trial reporting outcomes up to 2 year follow up. The Knee, 21(1), 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.07.010
- Turgeon, T. R., Cameron, B., Burnell, C. D., Hedden, D. R. & Bohm, E. R. (2019). A double-blind randomized controlled trial of total knee replacement using patient-specific cutting block instrumentation versus standard instrumentation. Can J Surg, 62(6), 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018318
- Victor, J. & Hoste, D. (2004). Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res(428), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000147710.69612.76
- Yan, C. H., Chiu, K. Y., Ng, F. Y., Chan, P. K. & Fang, C. X. (2015). Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 23(12), 3637–3645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3264-2
4: Teil-Endoprothese
Nutzen
-
- Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J. & Campbell, H. (2019). The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 394(10200), 746–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)31281-4
- Beard, D. J., Davies, L. J., Cook, J. A., MacLennan, G., Price, A., Kent, S., Hudson, J., Carr, A., Leal, J. & Campbell, H. (2020). Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the TOPKAT RCT. Health Technol Assess, 24(20), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24200
Austausch von Prothesenteilen (Registerdaten)
-
- Bini, S. A., Cafri, G. & Khatod, M. (2017). Midterm-Adjusted Survival Comparing the Best Performing Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasties in a Registry. The Journal of arthroplasty, 32(11), 3352–3355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.050
- Gioe, T. J., Novak, C., Sinner, P., Ma, W. & Mehle, S. (2007). Knee arthroplasty in the young patient: survival in a community registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 464, 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e31812f79a9
- Liddle, A. D., Judge, A., Pandit, H. & Murray, D. W. (2014). Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101 330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The Lancet, 384(9952), 1437–1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60419-0
5: Total-Endoprothese mit verschiedenen Kopplungsgraden
Nutzen
-
- Chaudhary, R., Beaupré, L. A. & Johnston, D. W. C. (2008). Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 90(12), 2579–2586. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.00995
- Dowsey, M. M., Gould, D. J., Spelman, T., Pandy, M. G. & Choong, P. F. (2020). A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing a Medial Stabilized Total Knee Prosthesis to a Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Design: A Report of the Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Total Knee Replacement. The Journal of arthroplasty, 35(6), 1583-1590.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.085
- Molt, M. & Toksvig-Larsen, S. (2014). Similar early migration when comparing CR and PS in Triathlon™ TKA: A prospective randomised RSA trial. The Knee, 21(5), 949–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2014.05.012
- van den Boom, L. G. H., Brouwer, R. W., van den Akker-Scheek, I., Reininga, I. H. F., Vries, A. J. de, Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A. & van Raay, J. (2019). No Difference in Recovery of Patient-Reported Outcome and Range of Motion between Cruciate Retaining and Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. The journal of knee surgery. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1693023
Austausch von Prothesenteilen (Registerdaten)
-
- Jameson, S. S., Asaad, A., Diament, M., Kasim, A., Bigirumurame, T., Baker, P., Mason, J., Partington, P. & Reed, M. (2019). Antibiotic-loaded bone cement is associated with a lower risk of revision following primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 731,214 cases using National Joint Registry data. Bone Joint J, 101-B(11), 1331–1347. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2019-0196.R1
6: Total-Endoprothese mit oder ohne Ersatz der Kniescheibenrückseite
Nutzen
-
- Ali, A., Lindstrand, A., Nilsdotter, A. & Sundberg, M. (2016). Similar patient-reported outcomes and performance after total knee arthroplasty with or without patellar resurfacing. Acta Orthop, 87(3), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2016.1170548
- Breeman, S., Campbell, M., Dakin, H., Fiddian, N., Fitzpatrick, R., Grant, A., Gray, A., Johnston, L., MacLennan, G. & Morris, R. (2011). Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: five-year clinical and economic results of a large randomized controlled trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 93(16), 1473–1481. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.J.00725
- Johnston, L., MacLennan, G., McCormack, K., Ramsay, C. & Walker, A. (2009). The Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT) design features, baseline characteristics, and two-year functional outcomes after alternative approaches to knee replacement. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 91(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.G.01074
- Kaseb, M. H., Tahmasebi, M. N., Mortazavi, S. J., Sobhan, M. R. & Nabian, M. H. (2018). Comparison of Clinical Results between Patellar Resurfacing and Non-resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Short Term Evaluation. Arch Bone Jt Surg, 6(2), 124–129. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5867356/pdf/ABJS-6-124.pdf
- Myles, C. M., Rowe, P. J., Nutton, R. W. & Burnett, R. (2006). The effect of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty on functional range of movement measured by flexible electrogoniometry. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 21(7), 733–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.02.008
Austausch von Prothesenteilen (Registerdaten)
-
- Clements, W. J., Miller, L., Whitehouse, S. L., Graves, S. E., Ryan, P. & Crawford, R. W. (2010). Early outcomes of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop, 81(1), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453670903413145
- Jameson, S. S., Asaad, A., Diament, M., Kasim, A., Bigirumurame, T., Baker, P., Mason, J., Partington, P. & Reed, M. (2019). Antibiotic-loaded bone cement is associated with a lower risk of revision following primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 731,214 cases using National Joint Registry data. Bone Joint J, 101-B(11), 1331–1347. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2019-0196.R1
- Julin, J., Jämsen, E., Puolakka, T., Konttinen, Y. T. & Moilanen, T. (2010). Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop, 81(4), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.501747
7: Total-Endoprothese mit oder ohne zementierte Befestigung
Nutzen
-
- Fricka, K. B., McAsey, C. J. & Sritulanondha, S. (2019). To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 34(7s), S183-s187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.024
- Fricka, K. B., Sritulanondha, S. & McAsey, C. J. (2015). To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). The Journal of arthroplasty, 30(9 Suppl), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.049
- Nam, D., Lawrie, C. M., Salih, R., Nahhas, C. R., Barrack, R. L. & Nunley, R. M. (2019). Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty of the Same Modern Design: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 101(13), 1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.18.01162
Austausch von Prothesenteilen (Registerdaten)
-
- Julin, J., Jämsen, E., Puolakka, T., Konttinen, Y. T. & Moilanen, T. (2010). Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 32,019 total knee replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop, 81(4), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.501747
8: Total-Endoprothese mit oder ohne computergestützter Navigation
Nutzen
-
- Barrett, W. P., Mason, J. B., Moskal, J. T., Dalury, D. F., Oliashirazi, A. & Fisher, D. A. (2011). Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty, 26(8), 1273-1284.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.037
- Gøthesen, O., Espehaug, B., Havelin, L. I., Petursson, G., Hallan, G., Strøm, E., Dyrhovden, G. & Furnes, O. (2014). Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J, 96-b(5), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b5.32516
- Lützner, J., Günther, K. P. & Kirschner, S. (2010). Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA, 18(10), 1339–1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1153-x
- Pang, H. N., Yeo, S. J [S. J.], Chong, H. C., Chin, P. L [P. L.], Ong, J. & Lo, N. N [N. N.] (2011). Computer-assisted gap balancing technique improves outcome in total knee arthroplasty, compared with conventional measured resection technique. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA, 19(9), 1496–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1483-3
- Petursson, G., Fenstad, A. M., Gøthesen, Ø., Dyrhovden, G. S., Hallan, G., Röhrl, S. M., Aamodt, A. & Furnes, O. (2018). Computer-Assisted Compared with Conventional Total Knee Replacement: A Multicenter Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 100(15), 1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01338
- Selvanayagam, R., Kumar, V., Malhotra, R., Srivastava, D. N. & Digge, V. K. (2019). A prospective randomized study comparing navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019848079
Austausch von Prothesenteilen (Registerdaten)
-
- McAuliffe, M. J., Beer, B. R., Hatch, J. J., Crawford, R. W., Cuthbert, A. R. & Donnelly, W. J. (2019). Impact of Image-Derived Instrumentation on Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rates: An Analysis of 83,823 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 101(7), 580–588. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00326
- Roberts, T. D., Clatworthy, M. G., Frampton, C. M. & Young, S. W. (2015). Does Computer Assisted Navigation Improve Functional Outcomes and Implant Survivability after Total Knee Arthroplasty? The Journal of arthroplasty, 30(9 Suppl), 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.036
9: Total-Endoprothese mit oder ohne patientenindividuelle Instrumente
Nutzen
-
- Kizaki, K., Shanmugaraj, A., Yamashita, F., Simunovic, N., Duong, A., Khanna, V. & Ayeni, O. R. (2019). Total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instrumentation for osteoarthritis of the knee: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 20(1), 561. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2940-2
Austausch von Prothesenteilen (Registerdaten)
-
- McAuliffe, M. J., Beer, B. R., Hatch, J. J., Crawford, R. W., Cuthbert, A. R. & Donnelly, W. J. (2019). Impact of Image-Derived Instrumentation on Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Rates: An Analysis of 83,823 Procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 101(7), 580–588. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00326
10: Total-Endoprothese mit oder ohne robotergestützte Navigation
Nutzen
-
- Liow, M. H. L., Goh, G. S., Wong, M. K., Chin, P. L., Tay, D. K. & Yeo, S. J. (2017). Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty may lead to improvement in quality-of-life measures: a 2-year follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA, 25(9), 2942–2951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4076-3
- Liow, M. H., Xia, Z., Wong, M. K., Tay, K. J., Yeo, S. J & Chin, P. L (2014). Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. The Journal of arthroplasty, 29(12), 2373–2377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.010